Institutional Review Board
The Henry Ford College Institutional Review Board (IRB) is a committee established to review and approve research involving human subjects. The purpose of the IRB is to ensure that all human subject research is conducted in accordance with all federal, institutional, and ethical guidelines. Individuals seeking to conduct human subject research may not solicit subject participation or begin data collection until they have obtained written approval by the Henry Ford College IRB.
Scope and Authority of the IRB
HFC's IRB is governed by the IRB Charter and Standard Operating Procedures, which are based on the requirements of the Code of Federal Regulations, title 45, part 46. The IRB has the authority to:
- Review research involving human subjects and approve, require modifications, or deny permission for those research activities involving human subjects at or affiliated with HFC.
- Provide continuing advice and counsel to personnel engaged in activities that involve human subjects.
- Require progress reports from the investigators and oversee the conduct of the study.
- Suspend or terminate approval of a study, or to place restrictions on a study, when this is deemed to be in the best interests of the subjects in that study.
- Observe the informed consent process in any approved project, especially in cases where the consentee is from a vulnerable population.
- Access and make copies of records related to any research approved by the IRB for any reason, regardless of the location of those records.
Submission and Review
Projects Subject to Review
- Only research involving living human subjects is subject to IRB review. Research is defined as a systematic investigation, including research development, testing, and evaluation, designed to develop or contribute to generalizable knowledge. Living human subjects means a living person about whom an investigator conducting research obtains (1) data through intervention or interaction with the individual, or (2) identifiable private information (obtained directly or indirectly from a source entrusted with human subject information).
- Use the IRB Review Decision Flow Chart to determine whether your project requires IRB approval.
- If you are unsure whether your study requires IRB review, please contact the HFC IRB at hfcirb@hfcc.edu
- The IRB conducts multiple types of reviews depending on the nature and scope of the research project presented. The timeframe for review varies depending on the type of review being conducted.
- HFC Student Research: The decision to submit to the IRB is up to the faculty advisor. It is recommended that all research involving human subjects be submitted to the IRB for review.
Submission Guidelines
- Compliance training for all members of the research team must be completed prior to submitting an application. Evidence of completion should be submitted with your IRB application.
- Prior to submitting your application to the IRB for review, please make sure that all study materials are prepared and attached to your submission email.
- If your study has already been reviewed by another school’s IRB, you must submit your IRB application, approved study materials, and approval letter.
- If you are affiliated with another school which has an IRB, you must receive IRB approval from that IRB prior to submitting to HFC’s IRB.
- HFC Student Research: Student research must be overseen by a faculty advisor or mentor. This advisor must be on all email communication and provide their signature attesting to their approval of your application.
IRB Review Criteria
The IRB safeguards individuals involved in research by ensuring that:
- The prospective subject population is appropriate in terms of characteristics and number.
- The recruitment of subjects is free of coercion.
- The design of the study is sound.
- Any risks associated with the research project are minimized to the greatest extent possible.
- The potential benefits are maximized to the greatest extent possible.
- The risk to the subject are outweighed or balanced by the potential benefits.
- The level of subject compensation (if any) is fair and non-coercive.
- The degree to which confidentiality is maintained is acceptable.
- The method used to obtain informed consent is ethically and legally acceptable.
- The investigator has the appropriate qualifications, experience and facilities to conduct the research.
- The informed consent process is appropriate for the study.
External Researcher Guidelines
- External researchers must obtain HFC IRB approval before any human subjects are recruited.
- For all research activities conducted by external researchers, an HFC employee must be willing to serve as a local sponsor for the duration of the project and act as a contact for questions regarding the research.
- External researchers must obtain IRB approval from the IRB at their own institution and provide documentation of IRB approval. Researchers who do not have an IRB at their own institution must follow all HFC IRB guidelines and submit using HFC IRB materials.
- Any external researchers desiring to conduct research at HFC or use HFC students as research subjects must also obtain permission from the Vice President of Strategy and Human Resources after receiving approval from the HFC IRB.
- When reviewing external requests, the HFC IRB and the Vice President of Strategy and Human Resources take into consideration how external research would be of benefit to HFC.
- In general, HFC cannot provide facilities of any type for external research projects.
- External researchers interested in conducting research at HFC should start by contacting the HFC IRB at hfcirb@hfcc.edu.
Levels of Review
The IRB will determine what level of research your study falls under based on your IRB application and study materials.
- Exempt research
- Exempt reviews are provided for research studies that are minimally invasive and that pose no potential threat to participants. Examples include education research, surveys, interviews, or secondary data analysis.
- Exempt categories
- Expedited research
- Studies that qualify for expedited review must present no more than a minimal risk to participants. Examples include collection of noninvasive biological specimens, collection of audio or video data, clinical studies of drugs and medical devices.
- Expedited categories
- Full Board research
- Research that presents greater than minimal risk and/or does not qualify for exempt or expedited review will require a full Institutional Research Board review.
Reporting Problems and Violations
All staff, student research investigators, principal investigators, or research participants are required to report to the Chair of the IRB Committee any of the following upon knowledge of:
- Unanticipated problems involving risks to subjects or others; and
- Serious or continuing noncompliance with the federal regulations or requirements or determinations of the IRB.
The report can be made by contacting the current IRB chair, Dr. Laura Willman, at lawillman@hfcc.edu.
Upon receipt of such information, or if a research project is suspended or terminated by the IRB, the IRB Chair will make a written report to the Henry Ford College IRB committee, the appropriate institutional officials, the head of any department or agency conducting or supporting the research, any applicable regulatory body, and the Office for Human Research Protections.
Henry Ford College IRB Members 2024-2025
Laura Willman, Ph.D. (Chair)
Research Analyst, Institutional Research & Business Intelligence
lawillman@hfcc.edu
Jason Young, Ph.D. (Vice Chair)
Director of Institutional Research & Business Intelligence
Bridget Smith-Botos, M.A.
Research Analyst, Institutional Research & Business Intelligence
Kalvin Harvell, Ph.D.
Full-Time Faculty, Sociology
Sam Bazzi, Ph.D.
Full-Time Faculty, Mathematics
Joe Zitnik
Director of Network and IT Infrastructure, Data and Voice Communications
Andrea Sakleh, M.A. Research Specialist, Center for Arab Narratives, Research Specialist
Questions? Contact:
Henry Ford College IRB
hfcirb@hfcc.edu